Banner

Action research as a method for improving the effectivity of change processes and stimulating learning in organizations: a case study

Action research as a method for improving the effectivity of change processes and stimulating learning in organizations: a case study

The central question in this article is how the use of a survey feedback methodology in action research can improve organizational change and enable all organization members involved to learn to change more effectively. Action research is based on the supposition that actors in organizations have useful and detailed practical knowledge and experience. Researchers, on the other hand, have knowledge about and experience in conducting research and theoretical knowledge about organizational change processes. Together, these two groups can examine the nature and causes of problems, make sense of research results, learn about the dynamics
of organizational change and make choices for interventions.

Action research can be used as a method to improve organizational change and to stimulate learning processes in and between organizations. Interactive feedback sessions of research results offer opportunities to understand the reasons underlying failure and stimulate interaction processes as well as a joint search process for alternative action. Making sense together of the reasons underlying failure can help people in organizations learn to handle
future change processes more effectively.

In this article we present a case study in which barriers to organizational change were studied and discussed with all organization members involved in a change process. We investigated the factors underlying the problems experienced by a Dutch institution for socio-cultural work in the implementation of self-directed teams. A questionnaire was used to map the approach and management of the change process and give insight into the experiences organization members had with the change process. This questionnaire was distributed among all
organization members concerned. We provided feedback on the issues raised in the interviews and the questionnaire to all team members. The team members then engaged in interactive sessions to understand the factors underlying their difficulties in working together in self-directed teams. Each team chose the problems that were most important for that team as a starting point for improvement. The team members thoroughly studied these problems and all teams suggested a range of possible solutions. These solutions were then discussed and actions were chosen.

Lees artikel